Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) writing intervention (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: writing intervention


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_Íkalatxt309 - : Another source for negative views on collaborative writing stemmed from the participants’ difficulty in synthesizing information from sources prior to essay production, as mentioned by one pre-service teacher: “At the beginning of the semester, we included too much information in the texts. We were not able to summarize the sources’ most essential ideas as everything was important to us. Summarizing is still difficult for me” (Participant 12). In the same vein, another participant provided a suggestion for a future writing intervention: “We should be allowed to take more advantage of the sources . The texts we wrote were very synthesized because we had to delete so many interesting ideas” (Participant 11).

Evaluando al candidato writing intervention:


1) participant: 3

writing intervention
Lengua:
Frec: 18
Docs: 5
Nombre propio: / 18 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.572 = ( + (1+2) / (1+4.24792751344359)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
writing intervention
: Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2014). Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations. Journal of Writing Research, 6 (2), 89-123. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.1.
: Koster, M.; Tribushinina, E.; de Jong, P. & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: a meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299-324.